Willem Ferguson
2018-06-01 08:34:03 UTC
Attached are the xml dive header and dive computer description of a
pSCR dive, as well as the UI rendering of the dive profile. Obviously
there there are significant differences between the xml and the graphic
derived from that dive log. The two most obvious discrepancies are:
1) In the UI, the dive computer is indicated as OC (see lefthand of
screenshot). However, in the xml dive log it is indicated as PSCR.
2) The xml event at 10 min 14 sec into the dive is a divemode transition
from OC to PSCR. However, on the dive profile it is indicated as
transition from PSCR to OC.
Now, the very real possibility exists that this results from Ferguson's
own doings and code changes by him. However after all the bailout
changes were performed the rendering of divemode changes worked
perfectly. The latest changes pertain to the dive planner and code in
planner.c, not affecting the dive log.
The obvious suspect are the changes to the names of divemodes,
separating the displayed names from the internal divemode names.
Robert, Stefan, would it be possible to have a quick check to see if
there is an obvious bug?
Kind regards,
willem
pSCR dive, as well as the UI rendering of the dive profile. Obviously
there there are significant differences between the xml and the graphic
derived from that dive log. The two most obvious discrepancies are:
1) In the UI, the dive computer is indicated as OC (see lefthand of
screenshot). However, in the xml dive log it is indicated as PSCR.
2) The xml event at 10 min 14 sec into the dive is a divemode transition
from OC to PSCR. However, on the dive profile it is indicated as
transition from PSCR to OC.
Now, the very real possibility exists that this results from Ferguson's
own doings and code changes by him. However after all the bailout
changes were performed the rendering of divemode changes worked
perfectly. The latest changes pertain to the dive planner and code in
planner.c, not affecting the dive log.
The obvious suspect are the changes to the names of divemodes,
separating the displayed names from the internal divemode names.
Robert, Stefan, would it be possible to have a quick check to see if
there is an obvious bug?
Kind regards,
willem
--
This message and attachments are subject to a disclaimer.
Please refer toÂ
http://upnet.up.ac.za/services/it/documentation/docs/004167.pdf
<http://upnet.up.ac.za/services/it/documentation/docs/004167.pdf>Â for
full
details.
This message and attachments are subject to a disclaimer.
Please refer toÂ
http://upnet.up.ac.za/services/it/documentation/docs/004167.pdf
<http://upnet.up.ac.za/services/it/documentation/docs/004167.pdf>Â for
full
details.